Numenarh once more…..lol!

I was wondering where did all the people that wanted Jackson guilty go? Or those that thought he was guilty? Or what have you. A good many supporters are posting on this site but no opponents of the verdict have posted anything, much, on the fallout over the verdicts all being innocent. Why? I guess cause they see no reason to ruminate on it. Not sure why it could not be a good discussion as to how and why this happened. Opinion versus fact and so on.

Recent Entries

9 Responses to “Numenarh once more…..lol!”

  1. Sue Says:

    I’m sure that like me, most of them were tired of your repeated insults and insane emails.

    You don’t know how to have a good discussion…you are just looking for an argument. Sorry.. not taking the bait.. go fish in another pond.

  2. Nadonga Biri Says:

    The person who claims he wrote the book is trash. I mean it. My question is why has he decided to come out of the closet at this time? What purposes does it serve to wait for an opportunity to disclose this type of negative publicity on MJ? Furthermore, is this legal or has MJ given him authority to write this book and disclose unhealthy information about the star? I say someone needs to write a book on him to determine the motives behind the accusations, and secondly investigate him as a suspect of sodomy thrill seeking on the male and female youths under his supervision to know who the real Bob Jones is.

  3. Cheetah Says:

    Many of the people opposed to the verdict were hoodwinked by the amount of negative innuendo that proceeded from pundit shows and networks like Nancy Grace, Court TV and the like. Much of the media showed bias towards the prosecution side of the case because a Michael Jackson who appeared guilty was just plain old more interesting news.
    Had these shows taken a more balanced approach to both sides of the case you wouldn’t have the disbelief and disappointment we find so prevalent now.
    It’s a shame and at the same time fascinating how much power propaganda can have over people. It can make the truth a much more bitter pill to swallow. I’m not sure of the legality of trying to sway a jury’s opinion via negative propaganda but in light of the cost of sequestering a jury, it should be against tthe law.

  4. Yvette Says:

    Why wouldn’t Tom Sneddon give Mr. Jackson his passport back? Sources say, it’s been lost!

  5. Cheetah Says:

    Yeah, right. Tom Sneddon is such a sore loser!

  6. numenarh Says:

    Your comments and ideas are refreshing to me Cheetah. Thanks for posting. I kind of think that some people just don’t want to argue, the case anymore, about the verdict cause it did not go some people’s way. If he had been found guilty so many negative posts and Ha-Ha mail-o-grams would have come my way. But that did not happen…so I find my self wondering how much longer this blog will stay open? Perhaps some people will continue to visit for some time. I know I will. 10 counts innocent and one lost passport…that is an okay trade. It appears a passport is all Sneedon could arrest so I guess he is savoring that and wishing on a star to get MJ back in court some day. Any way he can. Hope that never happens. This last go around was a media circus and was expensive and embarassing for many people. Including but not limited to MJ and Sneedon.

  7. Yvette Says:

    According to the sources at the Santa Barbara court house, Mr. Jackon has his passport in hand again. I suppose they are getting so many complaint s about Tom Sneddon he had to turn it over.

  8. numenarh Says:

    Thanks Yvette. I appreciate that post.
    Glad to know he has the ‘Port back.

  9. Yvette Says:

    Welcome!