Numenarh…Explains a thing.
Sue and the other agree-person to Sue. I am going to say this one more time and then never explain it again: Innocent of all charges, means not guilty, is not rude or disrespectful to Sue or anyone in the least. Proof must be presented. Just because there is not proof does not mean someone did not commit the acts. It does mean however, in a court of law, if a jury of your peers finds you innocent then, Legally, you are. The end.
The end, agian I say it. Pedophiles are terrible people, I know, but if I and a few people just got together and blackballed Ed Doe and started slandering him then that would be horrid. What if Sue had the power to arrest MJ on her on credit? What a bad America that would be, for sure. In courts proof is needed and Sneedon did not have it. Legally MJ is innocent and that means not guilty of what he was charged with. I don’t much care that you are opposed to the verdict, difference of opinion is great, but I do mind you telling me that it is insulting to you that I say the truth. MJ is innocent, legally of the crimes. A jury of 12 people I’ve never met says so. In addition about the woman and the pedophile grandson. I honestly have not heard anything about that. But Sneedon has challenges he can just strike a juror for no reason at all. Not sure how may dismissals he gets…I think 3. Don’t quote me. Sneedon should have done better background work…He had two years! The woman who loves Pedophiles, if she does that is, should have been discovered. After all background checks are legal and common place. Where a juror is involved I would think Sneedon could have been more diligent. And one more thing: 
If you have MJ’s passport can you please return it? (That’s a joke btw)
Recent Entries
- Michael Jacskon Shuts Down Neverland House
- Neverland Nevermore for Michael Jackson
- Two plead guilty to recording Jackson
- Macauly Culkin - “Michael Jackson’s isolation is Regrettable”
- Michael Jackson Gets 24-Hour Extension From State
- Jermaine Jackson: ‘I fear Michael is guilty’
- Michael Jackson Considers moving to UK
- Michael Jackson to face suit for unpaid cash
- Reality check for Michael Jackson as Neverland shuts
- Michael Jackson Faces Deadline To Pay Workers
June 26th, 2005 at 1:50 pm
FOR THE LAST TIME.. THEY DID NOT SAY HE WAS INNOCENT OF ALL CHARGES!!!
HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY… YOU CAN SAY IT THE OTHER WAY ALL YOU WANT, THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT SO. YOU SHOW ME ONE..JUST ONE STATEMENT MADE BY THE COURTS, THAT HE WAS FOUND INNOCENT. FOR PETES SAKE.. GET OVER YOURSELF WILL YOU? I WILL NEVER AGREE WITH YOU UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE IT TO ME … AND YOU CANT’ DO GIVE IT UP WILL YOU?
WHEN I HEARD THE VERDICT READ, I HEARD NOT GUILTY ON EACH CHARGE.. NOT INNOCENT ON EACH CHARGE.
June 28th, 2005 at 1:24 am
numenarh - granny-juror #5 does in fact have a grandson who is a convicted pedophile - sneedon SHOULD have sniffed this out - or maybe the granny should have been required to divulge that morsel of information. This is the same woman who had her granddaughter inthe process of writing a book on the trial. Another woman on the jury, said she was so emotionally involved that when she heard the song “beat it” she began to weep uncontrollably. I would say she was not stable and therefore not qualified to sit on the jury. If she couldn’t control her emotions to the point she was sobbing at hearing a mj song, how clear was her judgement? I devoted very little time to learnign more about the jury panel, after hearing 2 of backgrounds (pedophile lovin’ granny and sobbing unstable woman) I came to realize again, our system is not perfect and human error is always present.
MJ is a free man, however in my opinion he is a guilty man with extremely good luck.